Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.
Skip to main content

Table 2 Current reports on outcome of two-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

From: Two-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Year

Author

Level of study

Country

No. of case

Mean age (years)

Bone graft

Mean F/U

Outcomes

2005

Thomas et al.

III

United Kingdom

49

35.4

Iliac autobone

6.2 years

IKDC: 61.2, Objective laxity: 1.36 mm

2013

Franceschi et al.

IV

Italy

30

29.1

Proximal tibia autobone

6.7 years

Lysholm: 90.2, return to sports: 66.7%

2016

Uchida et al.

IV

Japan

10

28.0

Iliac autobone

Minimum 2 years

Negative instability test, Lysholm: 96.6

2017

Mitchell et al.

III

USA

49

30.4

The Opteform allograft bone

3.1 years

Failure rate: 6.1%, Lysholm: 77

2018

Diermeier et al.

III

Germany

44

30.5

Iliac autobone

33.9 months

Lysholm: 77.2, IKDC: 69.0, Tegner: 4.1

  1. Values are presented as number only, mean standard deviation, or mean only
  2. F/U Follow-up, NA Not available, IKDC International Knee Documentation Committee
Back to article page

Knee Surgery & Related Research

ISSN: 2234-2451