Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of clinical and radiological measurements between groups

From: Robotic-assisted vs conventional surgery in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a clinical and radiological study

 

UKA-R

UKA-C

P

BS OKS

17 (6–41) [11–23]

18 (12–30) [15–21]

0.34**

BS Pain NRS

6 (2–10) [5–7]

7 (2–10) [6–8]

0.52**

Lengh of hospital stay (days)

2 (1–4) [2–3]

2 (1–3) [2–2]

0.25**

Surgery time

139 (125–156) [129–72]

106 (85–131) [98–124]

< 0.01**+

Sagital femoral angle

46 (42–57) [44–47]

48 (33–65) [44–53]

0.47**

aMDFA

98 (95–101) [97–99]

101 (96–105) [98–103]

0.02**+

aMPTA

86.9 (83–92) [85–88]

85.3 (81–97) [83–86]

0.26**

Slope

4.4 (1.7–7.0) [3.3–5.1]

5.3 (0.7–10.0) [3.8–6.9]

0.09**

Incorrect size

0 (0%)

4 (22%)

0.07*

Post-operative OKS

45 (37–47) [41–47]

39 (23–48) [37–42]

0.01**+

Post-operative pain NRS

1 (0–3) [0–1]

4 (0–9) [2–6]

< 0.01**+

  1. UKA-R robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, UKA-C conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, BS before surgery, NRS numerical rating scale, aMDFA anatomical medial distal femoral angle, aMPTA anatomical medial proximal tibial angle, OKS Oxford Knee Score
  2. *Fisher’s exact test; **nonparametric test median; + significant difference