Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of patients included in the dataset

From: Evaluation of a deep learning software for automated measurements on full-leg standing radiographs

 

Patients

Radiographs

Sample size (n)

167

175

Age

 Mean ± SD (years)

49.9 ± 23.6

 

 Range (years)

[3.1–89.0]

 

 Number of children

26

 

Sex

 Women (%)

103 (61.7%)

107 (61.1%)

 Men (%)

64 (38.3%)

68 (38.9%)

Imaging modality

 Conventional radiography (%)

121 (72.5%)

129 (73.7%)

 EOS (%)

46 (27.5%)

46 (26.3%)

Orthopedic implant

 Hip prosthesis (%)

22 (13.2%)

24 (13.7%)

 Knee prosthesis (%)

38 (22.8%)

38 (21.7%)

Malalignment

 Unilateral genu varum (%)

45 (26.9%)

48 (27.4%)

 Bilateral genu varum (%)

38 (22.8%)

39 (22.3%)

 Unilateral genu valgum (%)

16 (9.6%)

17 (9.7%)

 Bilateral genu valgum (%)

4 (2.4%)

4 (2.3%)

 Leg length discrepancy (%)

22 (13.2%)

22 (12.6%)