Skip to main content

Table 1 Patient characteristics of the two countries (the United Arab Emirates and South Korea) before and after propensity score matching

From: Do knee alignment patterns differ between Middle Eastern and East Asian populations? A propensity-matched analysis using artificial intelligence

 

Before matching

Propensity score matched (1:2)

UAE (n = 2196)

South Korea (n = 14,276)

p-Value

South Korea (n = 4392)

p-Value

Age (years)

48.7 ± 14.1

59.9 ± 15.8

 < 0.001

49.3 ± 14.0

0.998

Sex (male %)

51.5%

24.8%

 < 0.001

51.5%

1.000

Body mass index (kg/m2)

31.2 ± 6.3

25.4 ± 3.6

 < 0.001

25.1 ± 3.9

 < 0.001

Kellgren–Lawrence grade

 0

813 (37.0%)

3389 (23.7%)

 

1889 (43.0%)

 

 1

420 (19.1%)

1561 (10.9%)

 

679 (15.4%)

 

 2

442 (20.1%)

4216 (29.5%)

 

1097 (25.0%)

 

 3

384 (17.5%)

3729 (26.1%)

 

561 (12.8%)

 

 4

137 (6.2%)

1380 (9.7%)

 

166 (3.8%)

 

Hip-knee-ankle angle

175.1 ± 4.2

175.9 ± 4.9

 < 0.001

177.3 ± 3.9

 < 0.001

Medial proximal tibial angle

86.4 ± 2.9

86.9 ± 2.7

 < 0.001

86.8 ± 2.6

 < 0.001

Lateral distal femoral angle

87.9 ± 2.8

87.6 ± 2.7

 < 0.001

87.1 ± 2.6

 < 0.001

Joint line convergence angle

2.9 ± 2.3

3.3 ± 3.1

 < 0.001

2.4 ± 2.5

 < 0.001

Arithmetic HKA

−1.5 ± 4.1

−0.8 ± 3.7

 < 0.001

−0.3 ± 3.4

 < 0.001

Arithmetic JLO

174.3 ± 3.9

174.5 ± 3.8

0.014

173.9 ± 3.8

0.002

CPAK

 1

775 (35.3%)

3662 (25.7%)

 

973 (22.2%)

 

 2

657 (29.9%)

4801 (33.6%)

 

1709 (38.9%)

 

 3

302 (13.8%)

2303 (16.1%)

 

829 (18.9%)

 

 4

161 (7.3%)

1204 (8.4%)

 

260 (5.9%)

 

 5

183 (8.3%)

1393 (9.8%)

 

364 (8.3%)

 

 6

87 (4.0%)

686 (4.8%)

 

195 (4.4%)

 

 7

21 (1.0%)

89 (0.6%)

 

19 (0.4%)

 

 8

5 (0.2%)

87 (0.6%)

 

25 (0.6%)

 

 9

5 (0.2%)

50 (0.4%)

 

18 (0.4%)

 
  1. HKA, hip-knee-ankle angle; JLO, joint line obliquity; CPAK, coronal plane alignment of the knee