Skip to main content

Table 1 The main characteristic of the included RCTs

From: Intraarticular leukocyte-poor platelet-rich plasma injection is more effective than intraarticular hyaluronic acid injection in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled trials

Included trials

Study type

Group

Patients

Follow-up period (months)

Age (years, LP-PRP/HA)

Gender (male/female, N)

OA grades

Outcome measurements

Funding

Trial registration

Cerza et al., 2012 (Italy) [19]

RCT

LP-PRP

HA

60

60

1, 3, 6

66.5 ± 11.3 66.2 ± 10.6

25/35

28/32

Kellgren–Lawrence classification 1–3

WOMAC

Not mentioned

Not mentioned

Sánchez et al., 2012 (Spain) [18]

RCT

PRGF

HA

79

74

6

60.5 ± 7.9

58.9 ± 8.2

NA

Ahlbäck

Grades 1–3

WOMAC, adverse effects

Not mentioned

Not mentioned

Say et al., 2012 (Turkey) [16]

RCT

LP-PRP

HA

45

45

3, 6

55.2 ± 7.8

56.2 ± 5.1

5/40

6/39

Kellgren–Lawrence classification 2–3

VAS, adverse effects

Not mentioned

Not mentioned

Vaquerizo et al., 2013 (Spain) [21]

RCT

PRGF

HA

48

48

6, 12

62.4 ± 6.6

64.8 ± 7.7

16/32

22/26

Kellgren–Lawrence classification 2–4

WOMAC, adverse effects

From the Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery and Clinical, Príncipe de Asturias University Hospital, Alcalá de Henares; Orthopaedic Surgery Department, Fundación García Cugat, Hospital Quirón Barcelona (R.S.), Barcelona; and BTI Biotechnology Institute ImasD, Vitoria, Spain

EudraCT number 2015-004738-90

Montañez-Heredia et al., 2016 (Spain) [17]

RCT

LP-PRP

HA

27

26

3, 6

66.3 ± 8.3

61.5 ± 8.6

12/15

9/17

Kellgren–Lawrence classification 1–3

Adverse effects

Not mentioned

Not mentioned

Cole et al., 2017 (USA) [26]

RCT

LP-PRP

HA

49

50

6, 12

55.9 ± 10.4 56.8 ± 10.5

28/21

20/30

Kellgren–Lawrence classification 2–4

WOMAC, VAS, IKDC

Aesculap/B. Braun, Arthrex, Athletico, Cytori, Medipost, National Institutes of Health, Ossur, Smith & Nephew, Tornier, and Arthrex and Kensey Nash

Not mentioned

Raeissadat et al., 2017 (Iran) [22]

RCT

PRGF

HA

36

33

2, 3, 6

57.0 ± 7.18 59.5 ± 7.54

7/29

6/27

Kellgren–Lawrence classification 1–4

WOMAC, VAS

No funding

Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT): IRCT2013121815860N1

Louis et al., 2018 (France) [23]

RCT

LP-PRP

HA

24

24

1, 3, 6

53.2 ± 11.7 48.5 ± 11.5

14/10

11/13

Kellgren–Lawrence classification 1–4

WOMAC, VAS, adverse effects

No funding

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02211521

Buendía‐López et al., 2019 (Spain) [25]

RCT

LP-PRP

HA

33

32

6, 12

56.15 ± 3.0 56.63 ± 2.9

16/17

15/17

Kellgren–Lawrence classification 1–2

WOMAC, VAS, adverse effects

No funding

NCT02990745

Huang et al., 2019 (China) [24]

RCT

LP-PRP

HA

40

40

3, 6, 9, 12

54.5 ± 1.2

54.8 ± 1.1

25/15

19/21

Kellgren–Lawrence classification 1–2

WOMAC, VAS, adverse effects

Not mentioned

BTI-01-EC/07/ART

Lin et al., 2019 (Taiwan) [20]

RCT

LP-PRP

HA

31

29

1, 2, 6, 12

61.17 ± 13.08 62.53 ± 9.9

9/22

10/19

Not mentioned

WOMAC, IKDC, adverse effects

Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital Research Grant (VGHKS 103-075), and was registered with the Government Research Bulletin in Taiwan

PG10301-0457

Xu et al., 2021 (China) [15]

RCT

LP-PRP

HA

30

20

1, 6, 12, 24

56.9 ± 4.2

57.1 ± 3.4

10/20

5/15

Kellgren–Lawrence classification 2–3

WOMAC, VAS

National Natural Science Foundation of China ( 51,773,098, 81,670,817, 81,970,772, 21,908,019 and 21,776,044), Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin City of China ( 18JCYBJC28300) and the Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities (China)

ChiCTR-ONC-17013097