Double-level knee valgization osteotomy has high survivorship and a low complication rate in a single-center series of 58 cases with a mean clinical follow-up of 10 years

Table 4 Planned and postoperative lower limb radiographic measurements along with the correction accuracy and its significance

	Planned values	Postoperative values	Correction accuracy	p-Values
mTFA (degrees)	0.7 ± 1.1 [0.5, 0.9]	−0.4 ± 3.4 [−1.1, 0.2]	1.1 ± 3.5 [0.4, 1.8]	p = 0.01
mLDFA (degrees)	86.1 ± 2.3 [85.6, 86.5]	86.7 ± 2.5 [86.2, 87.2]	0.6 ± 2.5 [1.3, 3.4]	p = 0.04
MPTA (degrees)	91 ± 2.0 [90.6, 91.4]	90 ± 2.5 [89.6, 90.5]	1 ± 2.5 [0.3, 5.2]	p = 0.04
Mikulicz (%)	52.9 ± 4.3 [52.1, 53.7]	47.7 ± 14.7 [44.8, 50.5]	5.2 ± 15.7 [3.2, 9.2]	p = 0.006

^*The correction accuracy values are reported as absolute the delta values = postoperative − planned
mTFA mechanical tibiofemoral angle, mLDFA mechanical lateral distal femoral angle, MPTA medial proximal tibial angle, Mikulicz Mikulicz line percentage

ISSN: 2234-2451