Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison between groups with and without radiolucent line (RLL)

From: Does the clinical and radiologic outcomes following total knee arthroplasty using a new design cobalt-chrome tibial plate or predecessor different?

 

Without RLL (N = 329)

With RLL (N = 33)

P value

Hip–knee–ankle angle(°)

 Preoperative

−171.8 ± 5.9

−169.1 ± 3.6

0.01

 Postoperative

−179.0 ± 2.3

−179.1 ± 2.1

0.76

Preoperative MPTA (°)

85.0 ± 2.7

83.7 ± 2.0

0.01

Implant alignment (°)

 α

94.5 ± 2.3

94.8 ± 1.8

0.56

 β

90.0 ± 1.6

90.0 ± 1.2

0.98

 γ

0.8 ± 2.9

0 ± 3.3

0.12

 Φ

87.0 ± 2.4

86.6 ± 1.6

0.34

WOMAC score

 Preoperative

53.6 ± 11.1

51.7 ± 11.7

0.55

 Postoperative

9.1 ± 13.5

3.1 ± 4.7

0.22

Range of motion

 Preoperative extension

9.0 ± 15.1

9.4 ± 12.5

0.99

 Preoperative flexion

118.8 ± 16.3

118.8 ± 16.3

0.85

 Postoperative extension

0.4 ± 1.6

0.9 ± 1.9

0.67

 Postoperative flexion

136.7 ± 8.5

137.4 ± 5.2

0.18

  1. In this table, “with RLL” group refers to cases where RLL occurred at least once during the follow-up period
  2. RLL radiolucent line, MPTA medial proximal tibial angle, WOMAC Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index